PAPER #2: PEER REVIEW #1

Exchange papers with your partner, write "Read by ____" with your name at the top, and mark the paper, noting the strengths, weaknesses, errors, and confusing sections. Then write a 3/4 of page note that address the following issues:

1. How effectively does the opening paragraph do the following?

• Introduce the instructor under discussion?
• Introduce both Freire and his essay title?
• Set up a clear purpose to either evaluate the instructor or critique Freire? Is the specific judgment (positive or negative) clear?

2. . How effectively is Freire used in the paper?

• Are each of the major claims about the instructor linked to a quote or paraphrasing from Freire?
• Does each quote actually apply to the claim to which it is tied?
• Point out which quote most closely matches the claim to which it is tied.
• Point which quote is least matched to the claim to which it is tied.
• Are there other quotes that would work more effectively for specific claims?
• Does each quote have a signal phrase, a parenthetical citation, and follow the correct punctuation patterns?

3. What advice to you have for the next draft?